Tuesday, 9 December 2014

A38 valiant research

The Tank, Infantry, Valiant (A38) was a British tank design of the Second World War that only reached the prototype stage. Intended to meet the specification for a lightweight but heavily armoured tank for use in the war in the Far East, it proved to be an ergonomic failure. The sole example was retained by the School of Tank Technology after the war as a lesson to its students.[1]

Design and development

The Valiant, under General Staff specification A38, began as a candidate for an assault tank, with the thickest armour on the lowest possible weight, for use in the Far East. It was to be similar in intention to the 40-ton A33 Excelsior although far lighter. As the Valiant managed the same 114mm frontal armour with only 27 tons, it managed to achieve its primary goal, but only by making unacceptable compromises elsewhere.[2] At a time when British tank design was already at its nadir, this "terrible price for the weight concession"[2] led to what is probably the worst British tank of the war.[2]
The design brief of December 1943 called for three prototypes of a small, heavily armoured tank for the Far East. Speed across open country was less important, as was performance against armour. Design work started with Vickers, but they soon passed it to Birmingham Railway Carriage & Wagon, then finally Ruston & Hornsby, who built the single boilerplate prototype in 1944.[1] Vickers' original intention may have been to use parts of their Valentine infantry tank where possible,[3] but this did not survive the production choices of the other manufacturers, nor was the running gear of the far lighter Valentine compatible with the needs of such heavy armour. The largest point of commonality was the choice of engine, the 210 bhp General Motors 6004 two-stroke diesel, as used in later marks of Valentine. Construction was like that of the Matilda infantry tank - large cast armour pieces bolted together. Suspension was by six equally sized wheels on each side, with independent wishbone suspension units for each, rather than bogies. Concern was expressed about the possible fragility of these units in combat, but Valiant was never taken seriously off-road to test them. The drivetrain was to the rear, from a 210 bhp diesel. This low power limited the tank to a predicted top speed of 12 mph, although this was still acceptable to both the infantry tank and assault tank concepts.
Following from the later Valentine VIII & XI models, the turret was to accept either the QF 6 pdr or the QF 75 mm, with space for a turret crew of three (commander, gunner, loader). This was achieved at the cost of a large heavy turret with near-vertical faces and a massive cast front face with distinctively prominent bolts. The mantlet was internal and a weak point against accurate fire at close range. Unlike the late model Valentines it had a co-axial machine-gun.
The Valiant's suspension was tested by the Fighting Vehicle Proving Establishment at Chertsey in May 1945. The first day gave minor problems and was abandoned after only 13 miles (21 km) of easy on-road driving. However, the driver was already exhausted by this time, finding that the steering levers needed his full weight to operate and that the seat, footbrake and gearlever all carried risk of physical injury in using them. The Officer in Charge decided to abandon the trials there and then as it was impossible and unsafe to continue, reporting that "in his view the entire project should be closed"[1] There were also issues with weight distribution and the ground clearance of only 9 inches, and by that point of the war there was no longer a need for the tank.[4] The Valiant project was terminated.

Variants

Valiant II was mentioned in late 1943,[1] but little more was heard of it. In February 1944 there was more detailed discussion of a Heavy Valiant,[1] which may have been the same and has been reported as such in some sources.[3]
The Heavy Valiant was a substantially different vehicle, only using the turret and driver's compartment of the Valiant on a hull derived from the A33 Excelsior and its T1 suspension. This gave armour of 9 (hull front) and 10 inches (turret) thickness. Weight was now estimated at 42 tons, which is comparable with the original Excelsior despite almost doubling the armour thickness, and so this must have been a much smaller tank. Power was doubled to cope with the weight, using the new and compact 400 bhp Rolls Royce Meteorite engine (a cut-down V8 Meteor) and an improved transmission.[1] The mistake of the Valentine was to be repeated, where the turret was up-gunned to the 95mm howitzer of the Centaur IV at the cost of forcing the commander to take over the loader's task in a two-man turret. There is a record of a prototype having gone to the ranges at Lulworth Cove for trials in January 1945, but no other record of what it looked like.[1]

Present day

The sole Valiant was retained by the School of Tank Technology, where students were treated to an inspection of it at the end of their course and invited to find fault. David Fletcher wrote of this: "One hopes they started early in the morning."[1]
The Valiant can now be seen at the Bovington Tank Museum.

Description

One of the worst tanks ever built
Valiant was ordered as an Infantry Assault Tank for service in the Far East and the designers were instructed to keep the weight down as low as possible but to apply the thickest armour. The project was originally handled by Vickers-Armstrong but later passed over to Ruston & Hornsby Ltd of Grantham. In order to save weight the hull was reduced in size as far as possible. The front casting was virtually moulded around the driver while the turret ring actually stuck out from the sides of the hull. The turret, on the other hand, was enormous since the War Office insisted that a minimum of three men were to be accommodated. Valiant shared some features with the Valentine, notably the General Motors diesel engine, but the suspension was an original, if rather clumsy design.

Two prototypes are believed to have been built in 1944 and designs exist for an improved version featuring a Rolls-Royce Meteorite engine converted to diesel. In fact the tank never went into production and this is explained by the official policy which stated that no new designs should be built if they could not be completed before hostilities ceased. There may however be another explanation. During a test run in 1945 the prototype broke down after covering 13 miles. The driver was then found to be almost crippled by the driving position and in some danger of injury from the controls. The trial was called off immediately and the Valiant project came to an end. Other reports explain that the ground clearance of the tank was too low at the back and that the suspension system, located partly underneath the hull, was vulnerable on cross-country driving. Indeed it is very difficult to find an official report which has anything good to say about the tank at all.

Hostilities in Europe were ending so scheme was dropped in 1945.

Precise Name: Tank, Infantry, Valiant

Other Name: A38

DESCRIPTION

The Valiant appears to be one of the worst tanks ever designed in Britain. It is difficult to find any contemporary reports that say anything good about it!

The Valiant was originally designed by Vickers Armstrong to meet a War Office requirement for an Infantry Assault Tank for service in the Far East. During development the project was transferred first to the Birmingham Railway Carriage and Wagon Co. and then to Ruston and Hornsby Ltd. of Grantham.

The designers were required to apply the thickest possible armour while keeping the weight as low as possible. Inevitably the hull was very small; the front hull casting was virtually moulded around the driver while the turret ring stuck out over the sides of the hull. In comparison the turret appeared to be enormous, as it had to accommodate a three man crew, (commander, gunner and loader/radio operator).

The Valiant used the same diesel engine as the Valentine (See E1949.344), although it had little else in common with the earlier tank. Design documents exist for an improved version, the Valiant II, powered by a Rolls Royce Meteorite engine, converted to diesel operation.

Ruston and Hornsby built one prototype in 1944. Trials in 1944 – 45 revealed serious problems. With a power:weight ratio of 7.8hp per ton, the tank was slow. The ground clearance at the rear was found to be too low and the suspension, located partly under the hull, was easily damaged during cross-country driving. More seriously the driver was almost crippled by the cramped driving position and was in danger of being injured by the controls. Furthermore, the controls required inordinate strength to operate them. The tests were abandoned immediately.

Not surprisingly the Valiant did not enter production, officially because the war was likely to be over before the tank could be introduced into service.

Summary text by Mike Garth 

Other Numbers

NumberType
3952Original Accession
1952.1009Original Entry
294/8/R/7641Serial

Main utility type

Heavy

Country of Use

U.K. (1944)
Back to Top

Production

Object Production

RoleAttributionDatePlaceNotes
Manufactured1943Ruston and Hornsby Ltd.United KingdomLincoln

Era

World War 2

Nationality

British
Back to Top

Location

Current Location

BOVTM - B18 - WW2 Hall - Britain at Bay (Moved here on 14/11/2012)
Back to Top

Physical

Features

Part NameDescriptionNotes
Tracks/WheelsFull Tracked
Armament - Main Weapon TypeGun - 75 mm QF Gun
Armament - Secondary Weapon TypeCoaxial Machine Gun (7.62mm or 7.92mm)
EngineGeneral Motors 6-71M
Transmission5 Forward, 1 Reverse
SuspensionIndependent coil spring

Dimensions

Part NameDimensionValueUnitPrecisionNotes
CrewNumber4
OverallWeight27tons
Speed - RoadMaximum12mph
FuelTypeDiesel
RangeMaximum90ml
Armour ThicknessMaximum114.00mm
Main GunCalibre75mm
Engine OutputPower210bhp
FuelVolume
ProjectileNumber
OverallLength5.3m
OverallWidth2.8m
OverallHeight2.1m

Monday, 8 December 2014

A43 Black Prince research

Tank, Infantry, Black Prince (A43)
was the name assigned to an experimental development of the Churchill tank with a larger, wider hull and a QF 17-pounder (76 mm) gun. It was named after Edward, the Black Prince, a famous 14th century military leader.

Development

As a development from the Churchill, the Black Prince was a continuation of the line of Infantry tanks, that is slower, heavier tanks intended to operate in close support of infantry. The parallel development in British tank design were the Cruiser tanks, which were intended for more mobile operations. A43 was the General Staff Specification number issued in 1943, for an interim tank that would eventually be superseded by a "Universal tank" that would replace both Infantry and Cruiser tanks.
The cruiser line led to the Cromwell tank (and the 17 pounder-armed Challenger variant) and then the Comet tank (which had a 77mm gun derived from the design of the 17 pounder). These tanks entered service during the war. While not as heavily protected as the Churchill, the Comet showed the way tank development was going. This led to the last of the cruiser line and the first of the Universal tanks (now more widely known as Main Battle Tanks) - the very successful Centurion tank.
A larger gun than a conventional Churchill required a larger turret on a wider turret ring and consequently a widening of the tank hull to carry this. The Black Prince weighed around ten tons more than the Churchill so the suspension was modified and the tracks widened by 10 inches to carry the extra load. However, the Churchill's 350-horsepower (260 kW) engine was retained, leading to the tank's being underpowered and slow, with maximum speeds of 10.5 mph (16.9 km/h) on roads and 7.5 mph (12.1 km/h) cross country. This was so slow that the tank's tactical usefulness would have been limited. Consideration was given to the use of the Rolls-Royce Meteor engine; this would have increased the available power to 600 hp (450 kW), but the idea never left the drawing–board. Likewise, plans to fit the Black Prince with the turret from the Centurion were never carried out.
By the time the Black Prince prototypes had appeared in May 1945, the Sherman Firefly had acquired a proven combat record, the Comet tank was in service and the introduction of Centurion was imminent. All these tanks carried the QF 17-pounder or a derivative; all had better mobility than the Black Prince and the Centurion had frontal armour of comparable effectiveness. The Black Prince had become redundant and the project was abandoned.
The Black Prince marked the end of the development of the A22F Churchill Mk VII, and the end of the Infantry tank concept in British tank design.

TypeInfantry tank
Place of origin United Kingdom
Production history
DesignerVauxhall Motors
Designed1943
ManufacturerVauxhall Motors
Produced-1945
Number built13 prototypes
Specifications
Weight50 long tons (51 t)[1]
Length28 ft 11 in (8.81 m)[1]
Width11 ft 3.5 in (3.442 m)[1]
Height9 ft (2.7 m)[1]
Crew5 (Commander, gunner, loader, driver, hull gunner)

Armour152 mm (6.0 in)
Main
armament
QF 17 pdr with 89 rounds
Secondary
armament
2 x 7.92 mm Besa machine guns
EngineBedford Type 120 horizontally opposed 12-cylinder
350 hp (260 kW)
Power/weight7 hp/ton
Suspensionsprung bogie
Operational
range
about 100 mi (160 km)
Speed20.5 mph (33.0 km/h) on road
7.5 mph (12.1 km/h) off road
The only surviving Black Prince tank is held by the Bovingdon
Prototype for a heavier Churchill tank; it never entered production.
Black Prince was designed in 1943, the idea being to create a heavier version of the Churchill tank mounting the17 pounder anti-tank gun. Designed, like the Churchill, by Vauxhall Motors, Black Prince was wider in the hull to accommodate a larger turret to house the big gun, but in most other respects the two tanks had a lot in common. Armour thickness was the same, as was the suspension system, but the strangest similarity of all was that both tanks had the same engine, the horizontally opposed, 12 cylinder Bedford.

Later models of the Churchill tank, which weighed around 40 tons, were generally regarded as under-powered yet the designers elected to use the same engine in Black Prince which weighed ten tons more. Many experts believed that it would have been wiser to fit the 600hp Rolls-Royce Meteor but there is no evidence that this was ever done. Indeed, the prototypes did not appear until 1945, by which time there was no further use for them and the project ended.

The development of Black Prince closely paralleled that of Centurion and it was planned, at one stage, to fit the Centurion turret to the Vauxhall tank. Once again there is no reasonable explanation as to why this was never done. The Black Prince turret was not an impressive design, being vertical slabs of armour except at the front, and both turrets were designed to mount the same gun. Our exhibit is the only complete survivor.

Black Prince's hull is a larger version of Churchill VII and the turret design is from projected Centurion M1. Project abandoned in 1945 as Challenger, Sherman Mark Vc and Comet all had a comparablegun and were superior in cross country performance. Only 6 experimental models produced.

Precise Name: Tank, Infantry, Black Prince

Other Name: A43

DESCRIPTION

The Black Prince was a futile attempt to update the design of the Churchill Infantry Tank, (See E1949.339), by fitting a new turret with the 17pdr gun to an enlarged Churchill hull. The project was abandoned in 1945.

Vauxhall Motors designed the Black Prince to General Staff specification A43 in 1943. It was seen as ‘interim’ design, pending the availability of the ‘universal tank’ that would replace both Infantry and Cruiser tanks. (See E1951.34, Centurion Mark 1) The Black Prince was based on the design of the Churchill. The hull was enlarged to carry a bigger turret that mounted a 17pdr-tank gun. The Churchill’s suspension was modified and the tracks were 10 inches wider than those of the Churchill, (24in vs. 14in), to carry the 10 tons of extra weight due to the bigger hull, new turret and the larger gun.

Despite the increase in weight the Black Prince used the same 345hp Vauxhall engine as the Churchill, giving it a power: weight ratio of about 7hp/ton. As a result the new tank lacked agility and was very slow with a maximum speed 10.5mph on roads, about 7.5mph across country. This severely limited its’ tactical usefulness. Many believe that the Black Prince should have been fitted with the proven Rolls Royce Meteor engine of about 600hp. Contemporary documents suggest that this was investigated but never done.

The development of the Black Prince closely paralleled that of the Centurion and it was planned to replace its original turret with the better one developed for the Centurion; this was never done.

Six prototypes were built. By the time that these appeared in May 1945 the 17pdr gun was in service in the Sherman Firefly, the recently introduced Comet had the similar 77mm gun and the Centurion was about to makes its’ debut. All of these had much better cross-country performance than the Black Prince and as there was no need for an improved Churchill the project was abandoned.

The Tank Museum’s exhibit is the fourth prototype and is the only survivor.

Summary text by Mike Garth

Other Numbers

NumberType
35949Original Accession
1019Original Entry

Main utility type

Heavy

Country of Use

U.K. (1944)

Production

Object Production

RoleAttributionDatePlaceNotes
Manufactured1944Vauxhall Motors Ltd.United KingdomLuton, Bedfordshire

Era

World War 2

Nationality

British

Location

Current Location

BOVTM - B18 - WW2 Hall  (Moved here on 14/11/2012)

Physical

Features

Part NameDescriptionNotes
Tracks/WheelsFull Tracked
Armament - Main Weapon TypeGun - 17 pdr Gun QFSA Mark 6
Armament - Secondary Weapon Type2* 7.92mm Bessa Machine Guns Mark 2 1 Bomb Thrower 2"
EngineBedford, horizontally opposed flat 12 cylinder, type 120, water cooled
TransmissionMerritt-Brown : 5 Forward, 2 Reverse
SuspensionIndependent coil spring

Dimensions

Part NameDimensionValueUnitPrecisionNotes
CrewNumber5
OverallWeight49tons
Speed - RoadMaximum10.6mph
FuelTypePetrol
RangeRadius100ml
Armour Thickness - HullMaximum152mm
Main GunCalibre17pdr
Engine OutputPower345bhp
FuelVolume158gall
OverallLength8.5m
ProjectileNumber89rounds
OverallWidth3.53m
OverallHeight2.74m

SPECIFICATION
Designation: Tank, Infantry, Black Prince (A43)
Crew: 5 (commander, driver, gunner, loader, co-driver-hull gi!nner) 
Battle weight: 112,000lb
Dimensions: Length 28ft 11 in Track width 24in
Height 9ft Track centres/tread Width 11ft 3.5in
Armament: Main: 1 x 17pdr OQF
Secondary: 2 x 7.92 cal Besa MG (one co-axial) 
Armour thickness: Maximum 152mm; Minimum 25mm
Traverse: 360°
Engine: Bedford twin-six 350hp
Maximum speed : 11 mph
Maximum cross-country speed: 7mph (approx)
Suspension type: Sprung bogies
Road radius: 80 miles (approx)
Fording depth: 3ft 4in (unprepared)
Vertical obstacle: 2ft bin
Trench crossing: 10ft
Ammunition stowage: -

TOG 2 research

The Tank, Heavy, TOG II was a prototype British tank design produced in the early part of the Second World War in case the battlefields of northern France turned into a morass of mud, trenches and craters as had happened during the First World War. When this did not happen the tank was not needed and the project terminated.
A development of the TOG 1 design, only a single prototype was built before the project was dropped.

History[edit]

The second design to come out of the Special Vehicle Development Committee (nicknamed "The Old Gang" as it was made up of people who had worked on the original British tanks of the First World War) the TOG 2 was similar to the TOG 1 and kept many of its features but mounted the turret developed for the Cruiser Mk VIII Challenger tank design with the QF 17-pounder (76.2 mm) gun. Instead of the track path arrangement of the TOG 1 which - like that of the First World War British tanks - ran up over the top of the hull and back down, the track path was lower on the return run and the doors were above the tracks. Ordered in 1940, built by Foster's of Lincoln, the prototype ran for the first time in March 1941.
Although equipped with the same electro-mechanical drive as the TOG 1, the TOG 2 used twin generators and no problems were reported. It was modified to include, among other things, a change from the unsprung tracks to a torsion bar suspension and went through successful trials in May 1943. No further development occurred, although a shorter version, the TOG 2 (R) was mooted. The TOG 2 can be seen at the Bovington Tank Museum.
Tank Heavy, TOG II

TOG II* at Bovington tank museum
Typesuper-heavy tank
Place of originUnited Kingdom
Production history
Designed1940[1]
ManufacturerWilliam Foster & Co.[1]
Produced1941[1]
Number built1 prototype
Specifications
Weight80 long tons (81.3 metric tons)[2]
Length10.13 m (33 ft 3 in)[2]
Width3.12 m (10 ft 3 in)[2]
Height3.05 m (10 ft 0 in)[2]
Crew6 (Commander, gunner, 2 loaders, driver, co-driver)

Armour75 mm at the front of the turret 50 mm at the sides and 25mm at the rear of the tank
cemented armour on 0.5 inch mild steel
Main
armament
QF 17 pdr (76.2 mm) gun
Secondary
armament
7.92 mm BESA machine gun
EnginePaxman-Ricardo 12-cylinder diesel-electric
600 hp (450 kW)
Transmission2 electric motors
Suspensionunsprung (TOG II)
torsion bar (TOG II*)
Operational
range
50 mi (80 km)[2]
Speed8.5 mph (13.7 km/h)[2]
The Heaviest Tank in the Museum
This enormous tank was designed on the premise that World War II would evolve in the same way as the First World War. Some believed that existing tanks would not be able to deal with such conditions, and one of the most influential was Sir Albert Stern, who had been secretary to the Landships Committee in the First World War. In company with many others involved in tank design in 1916, including Sir William Tritton, Sir Eustace Tennyson D'Eyncourt, Sir Ernest Swinton and Walter Wilson, Stern was authorised by the War Office to design a heavy tank on First World War principles.

Two prototypes were built, both known as TOG for The Old Gang and they were even manufactured by the company that built Little Willie and the first tanks in 1916, William Foster & Co. of Lincoln. TOG I was very much like a big World War 1 tank with a turret on top. It was later scrapped. TOG II was a much more original design. It has two remarkable features, apart from its great size and weight. Firstly there is no gearbox or mechanical transmission. The huge Paxman-Ricardo V12 diesel drives two generators which power two electric motors which drive the tracks. The tracks themselves, after passing around the sprocket and idler, drop down below floor level in a tunnel to create more space in the engine and crew compartments - an idea which is virtually unique to this tank.

TOG II was completed in 1941. It was so heavy they could only weigh half at a time. The original plan was to fit machine-gun sponsons (another World War 1 idea) where the side doors are and the tank carried four different turrets between 1941 and 1945. In practice the ideas of The Old Gang were wrong. In reality tanks needed to be smaller and more mobile. Yet TOG II is even bigger and heavier than the German Tiger, proving that Britain could have produced heavier tanks had it wished.

The TOG Committee was set up in September 1939. Members had been mainly concerned with World War 1 tank design. The first specification was very similar to early heavy tanks. This was varied over several months to produced TOG 1, 1A, 2 and 2A. Project abandoned in 1944.

Precise Name: Tank, Heavy, TOG II*

Other Name:

DESCRIPTION

Weighing 80 tons the TOG II* is the heaviest tank in the Museum. It is one of those impracticable freaks that the military procurement process occasionally produces.

At the beginning of World War II (September 1939) some military officers and engineers thought that the new war would evolve in the same way as the First World War. The war would be static, with the opposing armies occupying two lines of trenches running from the North Sea coast to the Swiss border, separated by a ‘no mans land’ swept by artillery and machine gun fire.

Sir Albert Stern, Secretary of the Landships Committee during the First World War, believed that the sort of tanks being produced in 1939 would not be able to cope with these conditions. In company with other engineers involved in tank design in 1916, including Sir Eustace Tennyson D’Eyncourt (Former Director of Naval Construction), Sir Ernest Swinton and Walter Wilson, Stern was asked by the War Office to design a heavy tank using World War One principles. The group was called officially called ‘The Special Vehicle Development Committee of the Ministry of Supply’; unofficially it was known as the TOG committee (TOG: The Old Gang). It began work in September 1939.

The first design resembled an enlarged World War I tank with a Matilda II (See E1949.353) turret on top and a French 75mm gun mounted in the front plate of the hull. Fosters of Lincoln built a single prototype and trials started in October 1940. It was powered by a Paxman-Ricardo diesel engine and had an electric final drive. The electric drive burnt out and was replaced by a hydraulic drive; this also failed and the vehicle was scrapped.

In the meantime the committee was designing a larger vehicle of great size, the TOG II. Its most original feature was the diesel electric transmission where the V12 diesel engine drove two electric generators, which powered two electric motors, which drove the tracks. There was no gearbox or mechanical transmission. (Ferdinand Porsche installed a similar system in one of his unsuccessful prototypes built for the German Army.) The tracks, after passing around the front mounted idler dropped down below floor level to create more internal space, an idea thought to be unique to this tank.

Fosters completed the single TOG II prototype in March 1941. It was so heavy that it was only possible to weigh half the vehicle at a time. The design specified machine gun sponsons on each side where the side doors are, like a British World War I tank. These were quickly abandoned. The tank was fitted with four different gun turrets between 1941 and 1944, ending up with the type of turret designed by Stoddart and Pitt for the A30 Challenger Heavy Cruiser Tank (See E1987.9). This mounted a 17pdr gun, making the tank a TOG II*. The TOG II’s great length made it very difficult to steer and combined with its weight and low power weight ratio (7.5hp/ton) made the tank cumbersome and unwieldy.

In reality ‘The Old Gang’s’ ideas were wrong; tanks needed to be smaller, agile and more mobile. The TOG II was finally abandoned in 1944, although the A22 Churchill (See E1949.339) had been adopted as Britain’s standard heavy infantry tank long before.

Summary text by Mike Garth

Other Numbers

NumberType
4951Original Accession

Main utility type

Heavy

Country of Use

U.K. (1941)
Back to Top

Production

Object Production

RoleAttributionDatePlaceNotes
Manufactured1941William Foster & Co. Ltd.United KingdomLincoln

Era

World War 2

Nationality

British
Back to Top

Location

Current Location

BOVTM - B18A - Tamiya Hall 
Back to Top

Physical

Features

Part NameDescriptionNotes
Tracks/WheelsFull Tracked
Armament - Main Weapon TypeGun - 17 Pounder Gun
Armament - Secondary Weapon Type1 x Machine Guns (Besa)
EnginePaxman Ricardo 12 cylinderDriving 2 electric generators which drove 2 electric motors for transmission and steering.
SuspensionTorsion spring
TransmissionDiesel electric

Dimensions

Part NameDimensionValueUnitPrecisionNotes
CrewNumber6
OverallWeight80tons
Speed - RoadMaximum8.5mph
FuelTypeDiesel
RangeRadius50ml
Armour ThicknessMaximum76.2mm
Engine OutputPower600bhp
Main GunCalibre17pdr
FuelVolume
OverallLength10.13m
ProjectileNumber
OverallWidth3.12m
OverallHeight3.05m